|
|
| Author |
Message |
Anurag TK Yahoo User
|
Posted: Tue Jun 17, 2008 9:46 am Post subject: Are gear cycles better the normal cycles? |
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Diet Pepsi Max Fan Yahoo User
|
Posted: Tue Jun 17, 2008 9:53 am Post subject: |
|
|
| There is somewhat of a trend around fixies and people claiming that single-speed or fixed-speed bikes are better, but apart from the fact that they don't freeze or break, I completely disagree.Gears allow you to use your bike in a much more efficient way. They are essential in my opinion. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Tiny Yahoo User
|
Posted: Tue Jun 17, 2008 9:54 am Post subject: |
|
|
| They can be. If you live somewhere where it's flat, it doesn't matter. But if you live somewhere where there are hills, switching to a higher gear makes it easier to peddle uphill. But of course, you won't be going that fast in a higher gear. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
M R Yahoo User
|
Posted: Tue Jun 17, 2008 9:58 am Post subject: |
|
|
| If you llive somewhere flat it most certainly does matter. I and most everyone else use mutiple gears on flat terrain. Simple common sense. Multi gear bikes are better. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
zinnprojectbig Yahoo User
|
Posted: Tue Jun 17, 2008 10:29 am Post subject: |
|
|
| "better" is always a matter of context and preference.But a bicycle with multiple gears, even if it's just a two-speed kickback brake shift, is definitely adaptable to more situations. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
e.b. Yahoo User
|
Posted: Tue Jun 17, 2008 11:24 am Post subject: |
|
|
| When you hit that hill, or when starting out on a hill, you'll appreciate gears.And if you're older, not extremely fit and want to save your knees from injury, you'll like those gears even more.But for those who can deal with the limitations, a singlespeed can be a beautifully simple, easily-maintained machine. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|